Though the Cowboys might have the ammunition, with two first-round picks and running back Marion Barber, to spring into the top five of the NFL draft to make a play for Arkansas running back Darren McFadden, Jerry says he’s not gonna do it.
And we’ll believe him only when it doesn’t happen.
Our own MDS writes on the topic for the New York Times; Jones made the declaration earlier this week that he won’t make the move north in round one.
His reluctance doesn’t flow from what it takes to trade up. It comes from what it costs to draft a player that high.
“A team can get crippled, and I mean seriously crippled, from a financial standpoint by being up there in the top five or six,” Jones told the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. “It’s a real negative. Nobody wants in there, and the teams in there, they want out.”
He’s right. We’ve said it before, and we’ll say it again — forcing the worst team in the league to pay up to $35 million in guaranteed money for one unproven player isn’t the way to restore competitive balance. And so teams like the Miami Dolphins who would love to trade down won’t find a partner, unless if the Jimmy Johnson draft trade chart is relaxed to reflect the financial undesirability of the high-end picks. Given the picks that need to be surrendered to move up and the money to be paid to the player that is drafted at a high position, trading up to the top of the round makes no sense.
Of course, that’s what Jones’ comments might be aimed at forcing. Surely, if Jones already had a pick in the top five, he’d be twitching like Raymond Babbitt over the opportunity to land McFadden. Remember the Scouting Combine? Jones couldn’t contain his glee when D-Mac ran the 40 in a blazing 4.33 seconds.
Yeah, Jones wants him. Jones can try to deny it, but we don’t buy it. The game here, in our view, is all about getting the Fins to take less than the outdated trade chart would currently dictates for the No. 1 overall pick in the draft.
_2.gif)





March 29th, 2008 at 9:57 am
I’m not so sure Jerry wants Darren McFadden as much as people think. JJ is getting ready to pay Marion Barber a lot of money. Would you do that and then turn around and spend a high pick on another RB? That seems like a curious use of resources.
This all started because some writer speculated about the trade of the two 1st’s for McFadden. If Jerry in fact wants another RB, he can use one of his picks on Felix Jones. He’d come cheaper and is a polished KOR.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.25 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
March 29th, 2008 at 10:03 am
The Fins? Seriously? There’s no way Jones would have to move that high to take McFadden. It’s almost inconceivable that any team before Oakland would take him, so at most the Cowboys should be looking at trading for #3 or #4 (well, they shouldn’t be looking to trade up at all, but you know what I mean). It’s not too unlikely that McFadden could fall out of the top ten. Many analysts don’t even regard him as the best back in the class.
Frankly, the whole idea is ludicrous. The odds are that McFadden won’t even be as good a player as Barber, much less worth giving up a top ten back and two first round picks for.
Not that any of that necessarily means Jerry Jones won’t do it, of course.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
March 29th, 2008 at 10:12 am
Of course Jones wants McFadden. He’s just not gonna give up what it’ll take to get him.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.65 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
March 29th, 2008 at 10:13 am
Umm……….yea right.
Just another smoke screen. If Jerry Jones wants Mcfadden bad enough, he’ll get him somehow. He’s done it before and he’ll do it again. I’m not saying that its a particularily a bad thing; who wouldn’t want an owner that ponies up for the right guy. I have a feeling he’ll turn out to be a bust anyhow. Barber is a proven back and you can draft a speedster in the lower rounds to compliment him. I’d stand pat if I were him.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
March 29th, 2008 at 10:45 am
First thing the guy has “ever” said that makes sense.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
March 29th, 2008 at 11:01 am
Smokescreen.
But also, there is Marion Barber, and the Cowboys are already great, so there is no need to do crazy things to get Daren McFadden.
But like mentioned in other comments, I personally feel McFadden is by far the best player in the draft, and teams should try do what the have to do to get this once-in-a-lifetime gem.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
March 29th, 2008 at 11:03 am
Here at Vandelay Industries we took a scientific poll in the executive washroom and we determined there was a 75% chance of Dallas trading up(3to1).Since when Does Jerry Jones worry about $$$$ ??,Plus factor in the new stadium,and it sure looks like DMC will be the “wow factor” J.J.promised.Now if we could just get Play Now Sports to quit dropping big red balls filled with oil on us,we might have time to find that damn chicken………
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.85 / 5 with 7 rating(s)
March 29th, 2008 at 11:03 am
Actually, to whoever said Jerry is getting ready to pay Barber a boatload of money: incorrect. Barber is probably gone in ‘09 as Newman and Ware will both be free agents and locking them up is a lot more important than locking down a highly replaceable position like running back. Barber may be an intense runner, but he’s hardly a franchise running back. If he was, he would’ve taken that one carry to the house against the Giants. Also, a good deal of his gaudy numbers came late in ballgames against whipped teams like the Dolphins and Bears early last season. Jerry certainly isn’t going to give him a Michael Turner-type contract. Besides, Johnathan Stewart could still slip to the Cowboys if they stand pat. Stewart is faster than Barber and also strong.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.8 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
March 29th, 2008 at 11:07 am
The real issue is how far McFadden might fall in the draft. Everyone is assuming that the Raiders or the Jets will take him, but the Raiders already have a number of RBs on the roster and the Jets aren’t stupid. Let’s say McFadden gets past pick six:
7. New England: No way.
8. Baltimore: They just signed McGahee last year.
9. Cincinnati: Maybe, but they have more pressing needs.
10. New Orleans: Reggie Bush.
11. Buffalo: Marshawn Lynch.
12. Denver: No way he gets past Denver.
Moreover, after Denver comes Carolina, Chicago, Arizona, and Detroit all of whom could use a running back.
My guess is, if McFadden makes it to the sixth pick, the Jets try to auction it off to one of the teams between twelve and sixteen. If he falls past six, Jerry Jones might try and trade up before McFadden falls to the “running back row” that is the middle of the first round.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.65 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
March 29th, 2008 at 11:28 am
Jones’ is correct about the top 5 or 6
But notice who is sitting there with the 7th pick
If the Jet’s pass of McFadden, then this could work out
The Pats are notorious for underpaying players and trading draft picks
So take the 22nd pick and the 28th pick, added together that’s 1440 points, plus a 2009 4th rounder, for the 7th pick worth 1500, it looks like a good trade for both the (Evil?) Pats organization and the Cowboys
The only problem is that “(Hurt)All Day” made the 7th pick very expensive in the 2007 draft also.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.35 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
March 29th, 2008 at 2:10 pm
His value is tied in almost completely with the rookie campaign of Adrian Pederson. If Pederson would’ve fallen flat on his face last year there is no way we would be talking about Mcfadden being a top5 pick. That said, I don’t see him falling past the Jets
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
March 29th, 2008 at 2:35 pm
I agree with “Stormin”. Unless Gholston looks to fall to #7 (kinda doubtful at this point), I don’t think the Pats really want or need the high pick. And their next pick is way down at #62. Better for them to get a 22 and a 28 to pick up a decent DE, DT or CB rather than a “star” who might not pan out any better.
But another possibility for a Pats draft trade (just weird enough to work) would be to give up the #7 to ATL for their three second rounders.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
March 29th, 2008 at 4:20 pm
C’mon guys, if JJ was offense crazy then he wouldn’t have hired Wade Phillips. JJ has suffered through a decade of mistakes but now he has a great coach and an offensive coordinator that will take the job after Wade retires. Parcells built this team and Jones has realized that you focus on the draft as a whole not just the first round. This team is a few role players away from a Super Bowl. Remember, they lost to New England because they had ONE starting corner against their all-star WR crew. C’mon.
The Pacman deal is imminent and that will give Dallas three solid corners. I expect them to draft the best running back/corner that’s there at 22. Ideally that back will be Stewart. McFadden is a perfect fit in Oakland where they can build on having franchise type quarterback and running back duo.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
March 29th, 2008 at 5:27 pm
@ Dan Dizzle.
“…they had ONE starting corner…”
“The Pacman deal is imminent and that will give Dallas three solid corners.”
I thought 1+1=2, not three, but I’m not going to get stuck on that point.
The speculation I’ve heard is that if and when the ‘Boys get Pacman, they will move the aging Anthony Henry to safety and go with Henry and Hamlin at safety, and move Roy “Turtle” Williams to special role-type packages in which he can utilize his D-Tackle speed with his ability to tackle from behind while clutching the horse collar.
So if this is true, and I’m assuming you’re talking about Henry as a third “solid” corner, they would still have only 2 “solid,” or “starting” corners.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.75 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
March 29th, 2008 at 6:41 pm
This reeks, but at least Mr Jones is starting to sound sane again. The Cowboys will be fine if they draft a mid-round RB to give Barber breathers… like Ray Rice. Maybe even get that lightning bolt outta East Carolina that ran a sub 4.3 at the Combine in the second round (he’ll probably be gone but anything can happen on Draft Day).
The problem, as I see it, is their pitiful secondary. Its so glaringly obvious.
1) Terrance Newman is coming off a big injury.
2) Roy Williams can’t cover, doesn’t wrap-up when he tackles, and can’t seem to stop horse-collarin’ the WRs who burn him.
3) Grown men can pretty much choose their own names these days. That said, how could you expect anyone to take you seriously if you introduce yourself as “Pacman”? He’s gonna go down as the Ron Artest of the NFL before Goodell bans him and any of his offspring from the League for life.
In short, the Cowboys’ secondary will consist of a gimp, a liability, and the rankest day-after-Thanksgiving turd that ever clogged a low-flow toilet. Please Mr Jones, Spend both first rounders on CBs!
RW is a liability
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
March 29th, 2008 at 7:09 pm
Why would the Cowboys stick a 5 time Pro Bowl safety on the bench?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.35 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
March 29th, 2008 at 10:19 pm
Pitiful secondary? Three of the four starters went to the Pro Bowl last year! Newman was injured early (missed the first two games, was a backup in a couple more. “Big injury”?) and came back well enough to be sent to his first Pro Bowl.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
March 29th, 2008 at 11:28 pm
Vox, allow me to pile on. Pitiful secondary? The Cowboys gave up a mere 140 net passing yards to the eventual Super Bowl Champion Giants in their playoff game, the Giants’ fewest passing yards in their playoff run. Yes, that was over 100 yards better than the mighty, mighty best….team….ever….Patriots gave up to them. So, Newman, Henry, Williams and Hamlin aren’t really so pitiful, huh?
Let’s be clear: it was the Cowboys’ high-powered offense’s fart of a performance (17 points against a team they had previously hung 45 and 31 on) that cost them a playoff win.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
March 30th, 2008 at 7:42 am
The tyrant pines for McFadden while the Tuna prays for- McDonalds? Probably. But he can have an assistant fetch that. No. The answer is McTakers.
The Cowboys are 2 maybe 3 impact players away from playing in the game of all games. The Dolphins are 2 maybe 3 years away from playing competitive football in a video game. Dallas needs star-caliber production for the present; Miami needs star-caliber potential for the future. The probable deterrent that will wedge the aisle from the altar in a matrimony masterfully manufactured by those of Mt. Olympus will be not 300 hundred Spartans but 2, their Thermopile not topography but the top of a negotiation table.
Spartan is a synonym for frugal, severe, economical, cheap. If both sides remain stubborn on what they’ll offer or accept then there isn’t enough philosophy in all of ancient Greece to meld egos as self-indulgent as that of emperors.
The Cowboys would most certainly have to tap the pot again after throwing in their 2 first round selections. The drop off in talent from the #1 overall to the 22nd is significant enough to be worth the difference of 15 or so million dollars. The league allowing the outrageous cost of unproven rookies to skyrocket has nothing to do with the disparity of aptitude. Mendenhall and Jones may one day prove to be as good or even better than McFadden. Thus is the nature of the NFL. But today, the Razorback is by far and away the better and more established athlete.
No soup for Jones or Parcells. One will offer too little, the other demand too much, and both will live to regret it. Next in line!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
March 31st, 2008 at 2:12 am
How does the league solve the runaway high 1st round saralies?
A rookie salary cap, as I understand it, would be subject to the CBA.
Would it be possible for the league to change the rules regarding the treatment of the situation where the drafted player is not signed prior to the next draft. Currently the team looses rights to the player and pick.
What if they allowed the team to be compensated with another pick. For example, one round (e.g. 32 picks) lower than the original pick. Or a pick directly after where the unsigned player is redrafted.
This sort of change would give the teams better leverage for negotiating those early pick contracts (until an NBA style cap can be implemented).
Any attorneys familiar with the CBA (hey Florio) care to comment on the idea?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated