The Jacksonville Jaguars and quarterback David Garrard are working on a new deal. But it’s not clear at this point whether a deal will be done.
What is clear is that Garrard’s camp opened the discussions by asking for more than the amount paid to Cowboys quarterback Tony Romo, who signed last season a six-year, $67 million deal, with roughly $30 million guaranteed. But the team initially offered Garrard at the the same kind of package signed a year ago by Texans quarterback Matt Schaub — six years, $48 million.
Though the specific progress made since then isn’t known, Vito Stellino of the Florida Times-Union reports that nothing is imminent.
Possibly, it won’t happen at all.
“Nothing is any different today than it was two months ago,” agent Al Irby told Stellino. “Maybe this week, maybe next week.
“It could take two days, two weeks or not get done at all. This is the way negotiations go. One minute you’re going down the right track, but then a snag can set you back.”
Adam Schefter of NFL Network recently reported that a deal is close. The good news for the team is that Garrard will not hold out if a new deal isn’t done by the opening of training camp.
Garrard is in the final year of his contract. Next year, the Jags could use the franchise tag to retain his rights (or to get two first-round picks if someone else signs him to an offer sheet that the Jaguars choose not to match). But to do so will cost them plenty. The franchise tender for quarterbacks in 2008 was $10.7 million.
_2.gif)





March 20th, 2008 at 12:10 pm
Seems really out of line in my opinion. Romo has that “it” factor and can make positive yardage despite those around him. Garrard plays error-free at the most important position on the field. But if I had to choose a guy to lead my team in the final 2-minutes, I’d opt for Romo every time. Garrard should get paid - not sure what his base is for ‘08 but likely it is much lower than it ought be - but I personally don’t think that Garrard should be in that ballpark…yet.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.85 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
March 20th, 2008 at 12:33 pm
Yea… Garrard is a game-manager and though he is good at it, those types of QBs never get huge deals. It could be because they’re usually too old to get one, however. Romo is the face of the Cowboys. The Jags don’t even have enough fans (sadly) to have one.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.75 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
March 20th, 2008 at 12:49 pm
Yeah, that sounds about right. I mean, Romo’s “It” factor has translated into how many post season wins? Garrard wins both in the regular season and post season, proven. You ‘Boys fans just keep enjoying those great efforts and moral victories supplied to you by Jessie’s boy.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.25 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
March 20th, 2008 at 12:55 pm
I agree. Romo money is too much for a guy like Garrard. He is solid, but isnt the type of QB that can carry your team. Matt Schaub money sounds about right for him
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
March 20th, 2008 at 1:01 pm
Jaguars haven’t had a real passing threat in years. Their passing offense didn’t put up flashy numbers last year but the problem was never scoring. The problem was on defense. Garrard does more than play mistake-free.
Romo is 0 for 2 in the postseason and went 1-3 in his last 4 games in 06 and 2-2 in 07 (and almost lost to the Lions).
Garrard and the Jags made history as the only team to ever beat Pittsburgh in Pittsburgh twice in one season. When the playoff game was on the line in Pittsburgh, Garrard got it done. Romo has yet to deliver a playoff win in Big D.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1.65 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
March 20th, 2008 at 1:21 pm
I say he deserves more just for the edge in playoff wins. But, admittedly, I could actually care less.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
March 20th, 2008 at 1:36 pm
Garrard was drafted by Coughlin and has been a perfect little soldier even after the Jags drafted Leftwich the following year. He was a true team mate in every sense. He never griped or asked for a trade. He just showed up for work. He satisfied his role and stepped up when his number was called. Romo’s contract was a lot higher than what many felt he should have gotten being an unproven QB. Garrard deserves to get paid like a top 10 QB. He hasn’t had a WR ranked in the top 50 and still managed to win a playoff game (which Romo has not). Pay him so the team can move on to the larger issue of finding an every down DE.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.35 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
March 20th, 2008 at 2:27 pm
Could not agree more with Kotite… Romo had/has Owens and Witten and a running game. Garrard had/has a running game on his side. Romo still manages to “xyz the pooch” in the end (playoffs) while Garrard finds ways to win. Give Garrard his due for hanging in tight while he waited for Leftwitch to part ways.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
March 20th, 2008 at 4:11 pm
The Jags? What have they ever won? You guys sound like you think they’ve won the Super Bowl or something. Of course a guy like Romo gets more money. Guess what? He’s QB of the premier money-making team in the NFL. Garrard’s the QB of a second-rate franchise that very few care about one way or the other.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
March 20th, 2008 at 4:17 pm
Uhhh guys, the Jags beat the Steelers in the playoffs in spite of Garrard, not because of him. 9 of 21 for 140 yards, one TD and two picks.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
March 20th, 2008 at 6:04 pm
The point, Vox, is that when it counted, he delivered. Romo was surrounded by the talent of a consensus top-2-NFC team and couldn’t close the deal.
Not only that, but since the 1995 season when Jacksonville was an expansion team and when Dallas won the Super Bowl… Dallas hasn’t won a playoff game. In that span, Jacksonville has made the AFC title game twice and won 5 playoff games. Including one buy their franchise QB. Which is one more than Dallas’s “franchise” QB has won. I can’t argue with the Cowboys’ heritage, but I don’t see how that’s relevant here.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
March 20th, 2008 at 6:40 pm
This makes sense. The Garrard camp has to know he won’t get paid Romo money, but why not start the bidding high? It’s the smart business thing to do.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated