<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;INSIDE THE NFL&#8221; NOT COMING BACK?</title>
	<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/03/18/inside-the-nfl-not-coming-back/</link>
	<description>The Best Pro Football Scoop on the Internet</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: stimpson3d</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/03/18/inside-the-nfl-not-coming-back/#comment-8319</link>
		<dc:creator>stimpson3d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 01:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/03/18/inside-the-nfl-not-coming-back/#comment-8319</guid>
		<description>I agree. The show had great footage and analysis.  However, in my book it is anathema to combine the word pigskin with potpourri (sp?) in the same sentence.  Good riddance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. The show had great footage and analysis.  However, in my book it is anathema to combine the word pigskin with potpourri (sp?) in the same sentence.  Good riddance.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=8319">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/03/18/inside-the-nfl-not-coming-back/#comment-8285</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/03/18/inside-the-nfl-not-coming-back/#comment-8285</guid>
		<description>It was once a staple in my watching habits, but last season pretty much sealed it for me. Highlights are available 24/7 and by the time Wednesday night rolled around, I was more interested in the upcoming games than the onea already played. But the footage was second-to-none so I would like to see NFL Films be involved in some capacity somewhere, even if it isn't for ITN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was once a staple in my watching habits, but last season pretty much sealed it for me. Highlights are available 24/7 and by the time Wednesday night rolled around, I was more interested in the upcoming games than the onea already played. But the footage was second-to-none so I would like to see NFL Films be involved in some capacity somewhere, even if it isn&#8217;t for ITN.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=8285">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian_21</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/03/18/inside-the-nfl-not-coming-back/#comment-8233</link>
		<dc:creator>brian_21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/03/18/inside-the-nfl-not-coming-back/#comment-8233</guid>
		<description>I disagree with both Koite and Pastabelly. The show is fine with four main hosts; that seems to be a good number. And, Chris Carter is good at arguing, whereas it's funny to watch Dan Marino's range of emotions every time his status as an all-time great is threatened by a current great. But yeah, four is a good number. You can get away with three if it's Ernie, Charles, and Kenny...

The show was not unwatchable. I watched close to every minute of all of the shows, when possible. I always enjoy it, and always have. I do not believe I am alone on that one. And obviously NFL Films made it that much greater. Hopefully another channel picks it up that has no conflict of interest with the NFL, or just another channel picks up the show in general. HBO is a good channel for anything because the censorship is minimized. Per King, the future does not look bright for Inside the NFL, but let's hope for the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with both Koite and Pastabelly. The show is fine with four main hosts; that seems to be a good number. And, Chris Carter is good at arguing, whereas it&#8217;s funny to watch Dan Marino&#8217;s range of emotions every time his status as an all-time great is threatened by a current great. But yeah, four is a good number. You can get away with three if it&#8217;s Ernie, Charles, and Kenny&#8230;</p>
<p>The show was not unwatchable. I watched close to every minute of all of the shows, when possible. I always enjoy it, and always have. I do not believe I am alone on that one. And obviously NFL Films made it that much greater. Hopefully another channel picks it up that has no conflict of interest with the NFL, or just another channel picks up the show in general. HBO is a good channel for anything because the censorship is minimized. Per King, the future does not look bright for Inside the NFL, but let&#8217;s hope for the best.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=8233">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kotite</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/03/18/inside-the-nfl-not-coming-back/#comment-8226</link>
		<dc:creator>Kotite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/03/18/inside-the-nfl-not-coming-back/#comment-8226</guid>
		<description>Inside the NFL is/was a "made for Tivo" program.  The show itself was unwatchable, but the footage was excellent. I would only watch it for the game footage.  Yeah.. you already knew the outcome, but you saw it from a different perspective.  NFL Films is great at what they do. If they cut that budget, we may not see that type of sideline footage again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inside the NFL is/was a &#8220;made for Tivo&#8221; program.  The show itself was unwatchable, but the footage was excellent. I would only watch it for the game footage.  Yeah.. you already knew the outcome, but you saw it from a different perspective.  NFL Films is great at what they do. If they cut that budget, we may not see that type of sideline footage again.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=8226">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pastabelly</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/03/18/inside-the-nfl-not-coming-back/#comment-8198</link>
		<dc:creator>Pastabelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/03/18/inside-the-nfl-not-coming-back/#comment-8198</guid>
		<description>That show has too many people on it.  You could have Costas, Collinsworth, and King and shorten it up.  Some of the special interest stuff was beyond boring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That show has too many people on it.  You could have Costas, Collinsworth, and King and shorten it up.  Some of the special interest stuff was beyond boring.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=8198">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
