A year ago, the quarterback who was supposed to be working out a long-term deal with the Jacksonville Jaguars is a guy named Byron Leftwich.
And what a difference a year makes.
Leftwich was dumped by coach Jack Del Rio nine days before the regular-season opener, and Leftwich currently is unemployed. His replacement, David Garrard, was solid. And is now poised to get paid.
According to Adam Schefter of NFL Network, the Jaguars and Garrard are close to hammering out a new contract.
It remains to be seen how much Garrard gets. Though he has only one year as a full-time starter under his belt, Cowboys quarterback Tony Romo parlayed less than that into a six-year, $67.5 million contract.
But Romo had more leverage — there was no way the Cowboys were going to let him get away, and he was within a couple of months of forcing owner Jerry Jones to slap the franchise tag (likely the exclusive version of it) on him.
Our guess for Garrard? We’ll say six years, $63 million, with $26 million guaranteed.
But what the hell do we know . . . .
_2.gif)






March 18th, 2008 at 10:50 pm
There’s a difference between Garrard and Romo. Garrard can’t possibly get a contract
that is similar to Romo’s.
Garrard is 30 years old, Romo is 27, Romo is entering his prime, Garrard will improve
slightly but quickly begin his the inevitable downhill spiral in physical ability.
Plus, Garrard hasn’t done anything, Romo had Pro Bowl numbers both years he started.
I say Garrard gets a 4 year deal, worth $9M per year.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
March 19th, 2008 at 6:34 am
Garrard will get what he deserves. More than a paltry $9M over 4 yrs (what is he Gus Frerotte?), but not quite that silly Romo money. And as to the notion that Garrard hasn’t “done anything” yet. Um… he won a playoff game which is more than Romo can say.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
March 19th, 2008 at 1:05 pm
The $ won’t be the same as Romo, but c’mon, David Garrard’s gotta cash in HUGE, and rightfully so. He’s darn good; I think anyone can see that.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
March 20th, 2008 at 7:43 pm
While Garrard is extremely good at avoiding costly turnovers, he doesn’t have anywhere near Romo’s big-play ability. And while some of that has to do with receivers some of it, well, doesn’t.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated